Non-Human Words: On GPT-3 as a Philosophical Laboratory

32Citations
Citations of this article
37Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

In this essay, I investigate the effect of OpenAI’s GPT-3 on the modern concept of the human (as alone capable of reason and language) and of machines (as devoid of reason and language). I show how GPT-3 and other transformer-based language models give rise to a new, structuralist concept of language, implicit in which is a new understanding of human and machine that unfolds far beyond the reach of the categories we have inherited from the past. I try to make compelling the argument that AI companies like OpenAI, Google, Facebook, or Microsoft effectively are philosophical laboratories (insofar as they disrupt the old concepts/ontologies we live by) and I ask what it would mean to build AI products from the perspective of the philosophical disruptions they provoke: can we liberate AI from the concept of the human we inherited from the past?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Rees, T. (2022). Non-Human Words: On GPT-3 as a Philosophical Laboratory. Daedalus, 151(2), 168–182. https://doi.org/10.1162/DAED_a_01908

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free