Abstract
Background: Plain film abdomens (PFA) are frequently used in the emergency department to help guide the management of patients presenting with abdominal symptoms. A plain film abdomen contributes minimally to clinical scenarios due to low sensitivity and specificity. Is a PFA useful in the emergency setting or does it serve to further complicate decision making? Aim: We hypothesise that PFAs in the emergency department are over utilised to falsely reassure clinicians and patients alike. Methods: A search of the National Integrated Medical Imaging System (NIMIS) database in an Irish tertiary referral hospital was conducted. All plain film abdominal radiographs requested by the emergency department between 01/01/2022 and 31/08/2022 were identified. Requests where there was suspicion of foreign body were excluded. A retrospective search of the NIMIS database identified subjects who underwent subsequent imaging. Results: A total of 619 abdominal films were deemed suitable for inclusion. These comprised of 338 male and 282 female subjects. Subjects had an average age of 64 years. Fifty-seven per cent of PFAs detected no abnormality. Forty-two per cent of subjects had subsequent imaging. The plain film findings correlated with further imaging in only 15% of cases. One case of ruptured aortic aneurysm and 11 perforations were detected on computerised tomography, none of these cases were evident on abdominal X-ray. Conclusion: Plain film abdomen requests are over utilised in the emergency department. PFAs are not sensitive for detecting acute pathology and should not be used to decide if a patient requires further imaging or a full clinical assessment.
Author supplied keywords
Cite
CITATION STYLE
McKenna, D. P., & McMonagle, M. P. (2024). Plain film of the abdomen remains a low sensitivity test in A&E. Irish Journal of Medical Science, 193(1), 341–343. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11845-023-03427-1
Register to see more suggestions
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.