Acid strength measurements of Amberlyst 15 resin, p-xylene-2-sulfonic acid and chlorosulfonic and sulfuric acid treated SiO 2 , Al 2 O 3 , TiO 2 and MgO

13Citations
Citations of this article
28Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

The measurements of the minimum acid strength (H O min) required for the initiation of cis-stilbene at 303 K and tert-butylbenzene at 313 K, 323 K and 333 K have enabled the establishment of a much more precise acid strength scale based on test reactions. H O min values obtained were: − 9.0 (cis-stilbene, 303 K), − 9.3, − 9.5 and − 9.9 (tert-butylbenzene, 313 K, 323 K, 333 K). The updated method was used for the determination of the acid strength of different catalysts obtained in the reaction of chlorosulfonic and sulfuric acid on different oxide carriers. It was found that the acid strength values depended on the basicity of the studied supports. For the supports treated with chlorosulfonic acid the values of acid strength were: − 11.5 < H O ≤ − 10.8 in the case of the less basic SiO 2 and − 9.3 < H O ≤ − 9.0 for the more basic TiO 2 , Al 2 O 3 and MgO. For the supports treated with sulfuric acid the acid strength was: -9.3 < H O ≤ -9.0 for the less basic SiO 2 and TiO 2 , − 9.0 < H O ≤ − 7.9 for the more basic Al 2 O 3 and − 7.9 < H O ≤ − 6.9 for the most basic MgO. Silica treated with chlorosulfonic acid possesses higher acid strength than HZSM-5 and amorphous silicaalumina. The catalyst obtained in the modification of TiO 2 , Al 2 O 3 and MgO with chlorosulfonic acid were of lower acid strength comparable to Amberlyst 15 and HZSM-5 (− 9.3 < H O ≤ − 9.0), but higher than p-xylene-2-sulfonic acid dihydrate (− 7.9 < H O ≤ − 6.9).

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Marczewski, M., Aleksandrowicz, M., Brzezińska, E., Podlewska, M., Rychlik, M., Żmuda, S., … Osawaru, O. (2019). Acid strength measurements of Amberlyst 15 resin, p-xylene-2-sulfonic acid and chlorosulfonic and sulfuric acid treated SiO 2 , Al 2 O 3 , TiO 2 and MgO. Reaction Kinetics, Mechanisms and Catalysis, 126(2), 1081–1096. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11144-019-01551-7

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free