Participation in universal prevention programmes

11Citations
Citations of this article
24Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Your institution provides access to this article.

Abstract

We analyse family decisions to participate in community-based universal substance-abuse prevention programmes through the framework of expected utility theory. Family functioning, which has been shown to be a good indicator of child risk for substance abuse, provides a useful reference point for family decision making. Our results show that well- functioning families (with children at low risk for substance use) should have the lowest incentive to participate, but that high-risk families may also opt out of prevention programmes. For programmes that are most effective for high-risk youth, this could be a problem. Using data from the Strengthening Families Programme (SFP) and the Washington Healthy Youth Survey (HYS), we empirically test the implications of our model and find that at least for one measure of family functioning those families with children most likely to be at risk for substance use are opting out of the programme. © 2012 Taylor & Francis.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Rosenman, R., Goates, S., & Hill, L. (2012). Participation in universal prevention programmes. Applied Economics, 44(2), 219–228. https://doi.org/10.1080/00036846.2010.502111

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free