Asset pricing with distorted beliefs: Are equity returns too good to be true?

168Citations
Citations of this article
87Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

We study a Lucas asset-pricing model that is standard in all respects, except that the representative agent's subjective beliefs about endowment growth are distorted. Using constant relative risk-aversion (CRRA) utility, with a CRRA coefficient below 10; fluctuating beliefs that exhibit, on average, excessive pessimism over expansions; and excessive optimism over contractions (both ending more quickly than the data suggest), our model is able to match the first and second moments of the equity premium and risk-free rate, as well as the persistence and predictability of excess returns found in the data. (JEL E44, G12).

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Cecchetti, S. G., Lam, P. S., & Mark, N. C. (2000). Asset pricing with distorted beliefs: Are equity returns too good to be true? American Economic Review, 90(4), 787–805. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.90.4.787

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free