Avoiding common pitfalls in mixed methods research?

4Citations
Citations of this article
15Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

This column is intended to address the kinds of knotty problems and dilemmas with which many scholars grapple in studying health professions education. In this article, the authors focus on how to help mentees take an analytic approach to improve their mixed methods work. Mixed methods research has increased in popularity and with that comes both strengths and weaknesses in these studies. We suggest key elements to look for when reading a mixed methods research paper. We also provide guidance around weaknesses we have noticed in reporting.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

O’Sullivan, P., Kuper, A., & Cleland, J. (2024, September 1). Avoiding common pitfalls in mixed methods research? Advances in Health Sciences Education. Springer Science and Business Media B.V. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10459-024-10362-y

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free