Trends in Self-reported Prediabetes and Metformin Use in the USA: NHANES 2005–2014

30Citations
Citations of this article
55Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Background: The American Diabetes Association (ADA) recommends that treatment with metformin be considered for prevention of type 2 diabetes in persons with prediabetes. However, metformin use outside the setting of diagnosed diabetes in US adults is not well characterized. Objective: To examine trends in self-reported prediabetes and treatment with metformin. We also compared characteristics of adults self-reported prediabetes who were vs. were not taking metformin. Design: Cross-sectional analysis. Participants: Adults ≥ 20 years of age who participated in the 2005–2014 National Health and Nutrition and Examination Survey (NHANES), n = 28,461. Approach: We characterized trends in self-reported prediabetes and metformin use in this population. We used multiple logistic regression models to identify predictors of metformin use among adults with self-reported prediabetes. All analyses accounted for the weighted complex survey design to generate nationally representative estimates. Key Results: The prevalence of self-reported prediabetes increased from 5.1% in 2005–2006 to 7.4% in 2013–2014 (P-for-trend < 0.001). In persons with self-reported prediabetes, metformin use increased, from 2.4 to 8.3% (P-for-trend = 0.013). Adults who were taking metformin were more likely to be obese and to report trying to lose weight in the past year. Conclusions: Self-reported prediabetes has increased in the past decade. Metformin use in the setting of prediabetes has also increased but remains relatively uncommon at 8% in adults who self-report prediabetes, despite current clinical recommendations.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Liu, C., Foti, K., Grams, M. E., Shin, J. I., & Selvin, E. (2020). Trends in Self-reported Prediabetes and Metformin Use in the USA: NHANES 2005–2014. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 35(1), 95–101. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-019-05398-5

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free