Discriminating Between Ordinary Least Squares Estimation Method and Some Robust Estimation Regression Methods

  • Idowu B
  • Kayode O
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
6Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

The lack of certain assumptions is common in ordinary least squares regression models whenever there is/are outliers and high leverage in the observations with an extreme value on a predictor variable. This could have a great effect on the estimate of regression coefficients. However, this research investigates the performance of the ordinary least squares estimator method and some robust regression methods which include: M-Huber, M-Bisquare, MM, and M-Hampel estimator methods. This study applies both methods to a secondary data set with 28 years (from 1900 to 2021) 200 meter races Summer Olympic Games with a response variable (sprint time) and three predictor variables (age, weight, and height) for illustration. Also, linearity, homoscedasticity, independence, and normality assumptions based on diagnostics regression like residual, normal Q-Q, scale-location, and cook’s distance were checked. Then, the results obtained show that the robust regression methods are more efficient than the ordinary least square estimator method.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Idowu, B. N., & Kayode, O. R. (2023). Discriminating Between Ordinary Least Squares Estimation Method and Some Robust Estimation Regression Methods. International Journal of Computational and Applied Mathematics & Computer Science, 3, 72–79. https://doi.org/10.37394/232028.2023.3.9

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free