Compositional Message Sequence Charts (CMSCs) are better to implement than MSCs

6Citations
Citations of this article
5Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Communicating Finite States Machines (CFMs) and Message Sequence Graphs (MSC-graphs for short) are two popular specification formalisms for communicating systems. MSC-graphs capture requirements (scenarios), hence they are the starting point of the design process. Implementing an MSC-graph means obtaining an equivalent deadlock-free CFM, since CFMs correspond to distributed message-passing algorithms. Several partial answers for the implementation have been proposed. E.g., local-choice MSC-graphs form a subclass of deadlock-free CFM: Testing equivalence with some local-choice MSC-graph is thus a partial answer to the implementation problem. Using Compositional MSCs, we propose a new algorithm which captures more implementable models than with MSCs. Furthermore, the size of the implementation is reduced by one exponential. © Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2005.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Genest, B. (2005). Compositional Message Sequence Charts (CMSCs) are better to implement than MSCs. In Lecture Notes in Computer Science (Vol. 3440, pp. 429–444). Springer Verlag. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-31980-1_28

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free