Usability evaluation of the Agente Escuta application: translational research

0Citations
Citations of this article
18Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate the usability and satisfaction of users with the interface of the ‘Agente Escuta’ application, in addition to identifying problems and possibilities for improvement. Methods: Descriptive exploratory translational study, characterized by a usability test with a quantitative and qualitative approach, subdivided into three stages: (I) prior evaluation of usability by 10 judges, including students, primary care professionals, professors and researchers in Information Technology and Speech Therapy; (II) evaluation of the application by the target audience, that is, community health agents from six municipalities in Rio Grande do Norte; (III) evaluation of the satisfaction of the agents who used the application in their work routine. The System Usability Scale and the Net Promoter Score were used, in addition to a qualitative evaluation of the opinions. Results: Usability was rated as excellent by judges, regardless of category. In the evaluation by community health agents, usability was considered good and there was no effect of the city of origin. It was found that the perception of the judges and the target audience were different, with a lower score for the participants in the second stage. However, most would give positive publicity to the product. The heuristic with the highest score was ease of memorization and participants in the third stage were interested in continuing to use the tool in practice, even after the end of the study. Conclusion: The Agente Escuta prototype showed good usability and satisfaction and aspects that could be improved in future solutions were identified.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Amorim, A. A. L., de Freitas Alvarenga, K., Jacob, L. C. B., & Araújo, E. S. (2023). Usability evaluation of the Agente Escuta application: translational research. CODAS, 35(4). https://doi.org/10.1590/2317-1782/20232022149PT

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free