Peripheral venous access using devices over needles with and without extension: costs and outcomes

1Citations
Citations of this article
22Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Objectives: to analyze the mean direct cost and peripheral venous access length outcomes using devices over needle with and without extension. Methods: quantitative, exploratory-descriptive research. Venous punctures and length of the devices were followed. The mean direct cost was calculated by multiplying the time (timed) spent by nursing professionals by the unit cost of labor, adding to the cost of materials. Results: the total mean direct cost of using devices “with extension” (US$ 9.37) was 2.9 times the cost of using devices “without extension” (US$ 4.50), US$ 7.71 and US$ 2.66, respectively. Totaling 96 hours of stay, the “device over needle with extension” showed a lower occurrence of accidental loss. Conclusions: the use of the “device over needle with extension”, despite its higher mean direct cost, was more effective in favoring adequate length of peripheral venous access.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Lima, A. F. C., Saba, A., Das Neves Filho, A. G., Couto, K. A., & E Silva, L. O. (2020). Peripheral venous access using devices over needles with and without extension: costs and outcomes. Revista Brasileira de Enfermagem, 73(5). https://doi.org/10.1590/0034-7167-2018-0921

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free