Laboratory employees’ perception of occupational risk factors

4Citations
Citations of this article
16Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Objectives: The purpose of this study was to assess the understanding and views of hospital laboratory workers related to risk factors in their work environment. Methods: This quantitative analysis included 234 laboratory employees in a university hospital. The data were obtained using a survey consisting of 19 questions: 8 items solicited demographic characteristics of the respondents, 3 questions determined their observations about the work environment, and 8 questions asked about occupational risk perception. Risk perception was evaluated using a scale designed specifically for laboratory employees. Frequency, percentages, and averages were used to present descriptive data. A t-test and analysis of variance were used to analyze occupational risk perception according to participant characteristics and responses. Results: A total of 162 women and 72 men (mean age: 40-49 years) participated in the study. The most common health problem observed was lower extremity pain. The occupational risk perception level was found to be above average (3.13±0.68). There was a statistically significant difference between the occupational risk perception score and the length of employment in the unit (p<0.05); however, no statistical significance was found between occupational risk perception and other variables (gender, age, field of work, education, or length of overall professional experience). Conclusion: The occupational risk perception score of laboratory workers with 11-16 years of experience was higher than that of more recent employees. Training is known to be effective and would appear to be a valuable investment in the development of risk perception among laboratory employees to ensure a safe and effective environment.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Boyaci, H., Dundar, G. I., & Senel, I. K. (2021). Laboratory employees’ perception of occupational risk factors. International Journal of Medical Biochemistry, 4(2), 61–66. https://doi.org/10.14744/ijmb.2021.02886

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free