Comprehensive numerical analysis of finite difference time domain methods for improving optical waveguide sensor accuracy

3Citations
Citations of this article
10Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

This paper discusses numerical analysis methods for different geometrical features that have limited interval values for typically used sensor wavelengths. Compared with existing Finite Difference Time Domain (FDTD) methods, the alternating direction implicit (ADI)-FDTD method reduces the number of sub-steps by a factor of two to three, which represents a 33% time savings in each single run. The local one-dimensional (LOD)-FDTD method has similar numerical equation properties, which should be calculated as in the previous method. Generally, a small number of arithmetic processes, which result in a shorter simulation time, are desired. The alternating direction implicit technique can be considered a significant step forward for improving the efficiency of unconditionally stable FDTD schemes. This comparative study shows that the local one-dimensional method had minimum relative error ranges of less than 40% for analytical frequencies above 42.85 GHz, and the same accuracy was generated by both methods.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Abu Samak, M. M. E., Bakar, A. A. A., Kashif, M., & Zan, M. S. D. (2016). Comprehensive numerical analysis of finite difference time domain methods for improving optical waveguide sensor accuracy. Sensors (Switzerland), 16(4). https://doi.org/10.3390/s16040506

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free