Perfectionism and english learners’ self-efficacy

3Citations
Citations of this article
31Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to examine the relationship between students’ English self-efficacy and the three types of perfectionism (adaptive, maladaptive, and non-perfec-tionists). A sample of 114 high-intermediate and advanced ESL students completed two self-reported surveys: the Questionnaire of English Self-Efficacy (QESE) scale and the Revised Almost Perfect Scale (APS-R). Pearson correlation, the hierarchical cluster analysis, MANOVA, and independent samples t-test were run. The main results showed that the total English self-efficacy scale and its four subscales correlated significantly with the Order and High Standards subscales. However, the Discrepancy subscale did not significantly correlate with the total English self-efficacy scale or with any of the four self-efficacy subscales. In addition, there was a significant main effect for perfectionism on students’ English self-efficacy: adaptive perfectionists scored higher than both maladap-tive perfectionists and non-perfectionists while the non-perfectionists scored the lowest. However, there was not any significant interaction between English levels and perfec-tionism.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Farag, I. M. (2020). Perfectionism and english learners’ self-efficacy. Journal of Educational, Cultural and Psychological Studies, 2020(21), 87–109. https://doi.org/10.7358/ecps-2020-021-fara

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free