Happiness in Communities: How Neighborhoods, Cities and States Use Subjective Well-Being Metrics

  • Musikanski L
  • Polley C
  • Cloutier S
  • et al.
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
37Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

This essay, the fourth and last of a series published by the Journal of Social Change, is intended as a tool for community organizers, local policy makers, researchers, students and others to incorporate subjective well-being indicators into their measurements and management of happiness and well-being in their communities, for policy purposes, for research and for other purposes. It provides case studies of community-based efforts in five different regions (São Paulo, Brazil; Bristol, United Kingdom; Melbourne, Australia; Creston, British Columbia, Canada; and Vermont, United States) that either developed their own subjective well-being index or used the Happiness Alliance’s survey instrument to measure happiness and well-being. The essay offers lessons to consider when using subjective well-being indicator survey instruments. Finally, the essay provides a process for measuring happiness using the Happiness Alliance’s survey instrument.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Musikanski, L., Polley, C., Cloutier, S., Berejnoi, E., & Colbert, J. (2017). Happiness in Communities: How Neighborhoods, Cities and States Use Subjective Well-Being Metrics. Journal of Social Change, 9(1). https://doi.org/10.5590/josc.2017.09.1.03

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free