Computational evaluation of cellular metabolic costssuccessfully predicts genes whose expression is deleterious

19Citations
Citations of this article
146Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Gene suppression and overexpression are both fundamental tools in linking genotype to phenotype in model organisms. Computational methods have proven invaluable in studying and predicting the deleterious effects of gene deletions, and yet parallel computational methods for overexpression are still lacking. Here, we present Expression-Dependent Gene Effects (EDGE), an in silico method that can predict the deleterious effects resulting from overexpression of either native or foreign metabolic genes. We first test and validate EDGE's predictive power in bacteria through a combination of small-scale growth experiments that we performed and analysis of extant large-scale datasets. Second, a broad cross-species analysis, ranging from microorganisms to multiple plant and human tissues, shows that genes that EDGE predicts to be deleterious when overexpressed are indeed typically downregulated. This reflects a universal selection force keeping the expression of potentially deleterious genes in check. Third, EDGEbased analysis shows that cancer genetic reprogramming specifically suppresses genes whose overexpression impedes proliferation. The magnitude of this suppression is large enough to enable an almost perfect distinction between normal and cancerous tissues based solely on EDGE results. We expect EDGE to advance our understanding of human pathologies associated with up-regulation of particular transcripts and to facilitate the utilization of gene overexpression in metabolic engineering.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Wagner, A., Zarecki, R., Reshef, L., Gochev, C., Sorek, R., Gophna, U., & Ruppin, E. (2013). Computational evaluation of cellular metabolic costssuccessfully predicts genes whose expression is deleterious. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 110(47), 19166–19171. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1312361110

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free