The Expert Epistemology of Climate Finance: Re-Visiting the Depoliticisation Critique

3Citations
Citations of this article
20Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

The response to climate change is orchestrated by international organisations, reflecting the global challenge and collaborative response. There is an established critique that this process is depoliticised—where institutions, policies, and practices foreclose contestation. This paper explores the downstream effects of this, where global knowledge practices intersect with national climate change planning. I nuance the concept of depoliticisation, drawing on the South African experience with the Green Climate Fund. I argue that there is an urgency framing, underlaid by scientific and financial rationales, which is willingly enacted by domestic actors. This limits the scope and participation in climate finance, empowering unevenly, rather than voiding politics. These effects are demonstrated by bringing together the depoliticisation literature with civic epistemology, to clarify how the epistemic geography of climate change in South Africa formulates, contests, and deploys knowledge. Re-politicisation is evident within the limits of urgency which is missed in depoliticisation literature.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Barnes, J. (2025). The Expert Epistemology of Climate Finance: Re-Visiting the Depoliticisation Critique. Antipode, 57(3), 808–829. https://doi.org/10.1111/anti.70002

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free