Advocating for a Political Vegan Feminism A Rebuttal to Val Plumwood and Donna Haraway’s Criticisms of Ethical Veganism

1Citations
Citations of this article
9Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

This paper highlights the vital connection between intersectional ecofeminism and veganism as profound ethical and political practices. It critically engages with the ideas of feminist philosophers Val Plumwood and Donna Haraway, revealing how their contributions, while significant in critical animal studies and ecological philosophies, inadvertently allow continued exploitation of non-human animals, especially for food. Drawing from neo-materialist feminism and recent developments in political veganism, this paper underscores the ethical and ecological imperatives for an intersectional and radical veganism. This approach seeks to deconstruct biopolitical structures upholding non-human oppression, envisioning liberation for sentient beings and ecological restoration. It argues that the boundaries between ecofeminism, veganism, and multispecies justice should blur to dismantle systems rooted in human exceptionalism and ensure non-human animals are not treated as mere tools. In conclusion, this paper advocates for a holistic approach to non-human liberation, emphasizing the urgent need to strengthen the bonds between ecofeminism and veganism. This union challenges prevailing biopolitical systems and paves the way for genuine liberation for all sentient beings, both human and non-human.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Feltrin, A. N. (2023). Advocating for a Political Vegan Feminism A Rebuttal to Val Plumwood and Donna Haraway’s Criticisms of Ethical Veganism. Relations. Beyond Anthropocentrism, 11(2), 41–62. https://doi.org/10.7358/RELA-2023-02-FELA

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free