Nitrogen and potassium fertilization in a guava orchard evaluated for five cycles: Effects on the plant and on production

14Citations
Citations of this article
30Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Guava response to fertilization can be monitored through plant tissue analysis. Correct interpretation of these results, based on standard levels, is of great importance for correct nutrient management of the crop. However, standard levels are constantly criticized for not considering interactions among elements. To improve the nutritional diagnosis of ‘Paluma’ guava (Psidium guajava L., Myrtaceae), an experiment was conducted using nitrogen fertilization (0, 0.5, 1.0, and 2.0 kg per plant per cycle of N, with urea as a source with 45 % N), and potassium fertilization (0, 0.55, 1.1, and 2.2 kg per plant per cycle of K2O, with potassium chloride as a source with 60 % K2O) in an irrigated commercial area for five consecutive cycles, 2009 through 2012, observing the influence of fertilizers and climate and assessing yield and leaf element content, using the concept of isometric log ratios (ilr) to interpret leaf analysis results (N, P, Ca, Mg, K, and S). This paper showed that nutrient balances and nutrient concentration values can be interpreted coherently using compositional data analysis. Ranges of nutrient balances also were established for “Paluma” guava and validated through ranges grounded in nutrient contents currently used in Brazil. Nitrogen fertilization increased “Paluma” guava yield. The 0.5 kg N application rate per plant and the other studied treatments practically showed the same results, and their values were affected by pruning time as well as the nutrient balances.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Montes, R. M., Parent, L. É., de Amorim, D. A., Rozane, D. E., Parent, S. É., Natale, W., & Modesto, V. C. (2016). Nitrogen and potassium fertilization in a guava orchard evaluated for five cycles: Effects on the plant and on production. Revista Brasileira de Ciencia Do Solo, 40. https://doi.org/10.1590/18069657rbcs20140532

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free