Comparison of lung ultrasound and other volumetric methods in peritoneal dialysis patients

6Citations
Citations of this article
17Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

AbstractAlthough many alternative methods are present, maintaining ideal volume status in peritoneal dialysis (PD) patients still rely on clinical evaluation due to lack of an evidence-based method. Lung ultrasound (LUS) is a new method for evaluation of hidden congestion in this group.LUS findings and its relationship with other volumetric methods are investigated in this observational cross-sectional study.In this observational cross sectional study, LUS was performed to all PD patients and compared with symptoms of hypervolemia, physical examination, vascular endothelial growth factor-C (VEGF-C), and N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide levels, chest radiography, echocardiography, bioelectrical impedance analysis.Data of 21 PD patients were evaluated. There was correlation between number of B lines and VEGF-C levels (r=0.447, P=.042), daily urine output (r=0.582, P=.007) and left ventricle mass index (r=-0.456, P=.038). Correlations with all other parameters were not significant. Daily urine output and VEGF-C levels were significantly different when B lines were grouped into 2 according to the median level (P

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Sevinc, M., Hasbal, N. B., Basturk, T., Ozcafer, P. N., Kocas, B. B., Kilickesmez, K., … Koc, Y. (2021). Comparison of lung ultrasound and other volumetric methods in peritoneal dialysis patients. Medicine (United States), 100(3), E23856. https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000023856

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free