Reviewing the Position of the Principle of Proportionality in Public Procurement Contracts

  • Pegau Y
  • et al.
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
9Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Procurement of Goods / Services carried out by the Ministry / Institution / Regional Apparatus as needed in order to support their duties and functions. The goods/services procurement process includes two components, namely the user of goods/services (Ministry/Institution/Regional Apparatus) and the Goods/Services Provider. Goods/services users and goods/services providers are bound in a Goods/Services Procurement Contract. The Goods/Services Procurement Contract is usually standardized, where the Procurement Contract is made by one party, namely the Commitment Making Officer (PPK) and the service provider is only a signing party. The different position between the goods/services user and the goods/services provider in the standard goods/services procurement contract causes the distribution of rights and obligations between the parties to be unbalanced or does not reflect the principle of proportionality.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Pegau, Y., & Risamaya Intan, M. M. (2023). Reviewing the Position of the Principle of Proportionality in Public Procurement Contracts. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MULTIDISCIPLINARY RESEARCH AND ANALYSIS, 06(07). https://doi.org/10.47191/ijmra/v6-i7-21

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free