Implicit and explicit systems differently predict possible dangers

12Citations
Citations of this article
29Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

One strategy to address new potential dangers is to generate defensive responses to stimuli that remind learned threats, a phenomenon called fear generalization. During a threatening experience, the brain encodes implicit and explicit memory traces. Nevertheless, there is a lack of studies comparing implicit and explicit response patterns to novel stimuli. Here, by adopting a discriminative threat conditioning paradigm and a two-alternative forced-choice recognition task, we found that the implicit reactions were selectively elicited by the learned threat and not by a novel similar but perceptually discriminable stimulus. Conversely, subjects explicitly misidentified the same novel stimulus as the learned threat. This generalization response was not due to stress-related interference with learning, but related to the embedded threatening value. Therefore, we suggest a dissociation between implicit and explicit threat recognition profiles and propose that the generalization of explicit responses stems from a flexible cognitive mechanism dedicated to the prediction of danger.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Manassero, E., Mana, L., Concina, G., Renna, A., & Sacchetti, B. (2019). Implicit and explicit systems differently predict possible dangers. Scientific Reports, 9(1). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-49751-4

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free