Abstract
We argue that editorial independence, through robust practice of publication ethics and research integrity, promotes good science and prevents bad science. We elucidate the concept of research integrity, and then discuss the dimensions of editorial independence. Best practice guidelines exist, but compliance with these guidelines varies. Therefore, we make recommendations for protecting and strengthening editorial independence.
Author supplied keywords
Cite
CITATION STYLE
Bhui, K., O’brien, A., Upthegrove, R., Tsai, A. C., Soomro, M., Newton-Howes, G., … Kaufman, K. R. (2025, January 1). Protecting and promoting editorial independence. British Journal of Psychiatry. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1192/bjp.2024.6
Register to see more suggestions
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.