Protecting and promoting editorial independence

7Citations
Citations of this article
2Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

We argue that editorial independence, through robust practice of publication ethics and research integrity, promotes good science and prevents bad science. We elucidate the concept of research integrity, and then discuss the dimensions of editorial independence. Best practice guidelines exist, but compliance with these guidelines varies. Therefore, we make recommendations for protecting and strengthening editorial independence.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Bhui, K., O’brien, A., Upthegrove, R., Tsai, A. C., Soomro, M., Newton-Howes, G., … Kaufman, K. R. (2025, January 1). Protecting and promoting editorial independence. British Journal of Psychiatry. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1192/bjp.2024.6

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free