Bonding and bridging relationships in collaborative forums responding to weather warnings

13Citations
Citations of this article
20Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Collaborative forums involving multiple stakeholders responding to natural hazards are prevalent, yet there is little conclusive evidence of how stakeholders exchange information across such forums and how different patterns of information exchange influence forum goals. This study analyzes information exchange among representatives of 51 organizations across 50 collaborative forums in response to weather warnings in Sweden, 2011–15. Using coded transcripts from forum meetings, the study estimates exponential random graph models to document the prevalence of network configurations of organizations across these forums. The results show that actors avoid engaging in information exchanges within closed subgroups and that no specific type or organization was particularly active in exchanging information. The study suggests that the forum structures are consistent with short-term operational goals as well as the long-term objective of these forums to sustain collaboration over time. The study discusses potential explanations for these patterns and implications for forum performance in relation to natural hazards management.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Nohrstedt, D. (2018). Bonding and bridging relationships in collaborative forums responding to weather warnings. Weather, Climate, and Society, 10(3), 521–536. https://doi.org/10.1175/WCAS-D-17-0134.1

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free