Falls and health status in elderly women following first eye cataract surgery: An economic evaluation conducted alongside a randomised controlled trial

45Citations
Citations of this article
86Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Aim: To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of first eye cataract surgery compared with no surgery from a health service and personal social services perspective. Methods: An economic evaluation undertaken alongside a randomised controlled trial of first eye cataract surgery in secondary care ophthalmology clinics. A sample of 306 women over 70 years old with bilateral cataracts was randomised to cataract surgery (expedited, approximately four weeks) or control (routine, 12 months wait); 75% of participants had baseline acuity of 6/12 or better. Outcomes included falls and the EuroQol EQ-5D. Results: The operated group cost a mean £2004 (bootstrapped) more than the control group over one year (95% confidence interval (CI), £1363 to £2833) (p<0.001), but experienced on average 0.456 fewer falls, an incremental cost per fall prevented of £4390. The bootstrapped mean gain in quality adjusted life years (QALYs) per patient was 0.056 (95% CI, 0.006 to 0.108) (p<0.001). The incremental cost-utility ratio was £35 704, above the currently accepted UK threshold level of willingness to pay per QALY of £30 000. However, in an analysis modelling costs and benefits over patients' expected lifetime, the incremental cost per QALY was £13 172, under conservative assumptions. Conclusions: First eye cataract surgery, while cost-in effective over the trial period, was probably cost-effective over the participants' remaining lifetime.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Sach, T. H., Foss, A. J. E., Gregson, R. M., Zaman, A., Osborn, F., Masud, T., & Harwood, R. H. (2007). Falls and health status in elderly women following first eye cataract surgery: An economic evaluation conducted alongside a randomised controlled trial. British Journal of Ophthalmology, 91(12), 1675–1679. https://doi.org/10.1136/bjo.2007.118687

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free