Guillain-Barré Syndrome: Natural history and prognostic factors: A retrospective review of 106 cases

77Citations
Citations of this article
151Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Background: Guillain-Barre syndrome (GBS) is characterized by acute onset and progressive course, and is usually associated with a good prognosis. However, there are forms of poor prognosis, needing ventilatory support and major deficits at discharge. With this study we try to identify the factors associated with a worse outcome.Methods: 106 cases of GBS admitted in our hospital between years 2000-2010 were reviewed. Epidemiological, clinical, therapeutical and evolutionary data were collected.Results: At admission 45% had severe deficits, percentage which improves throughout the evolution of the illness, with full recovery or minor deficits in the 87% of patients at the first year review. Ages greater than 55 years, severity at admission (p < 0.001), injured cranial nerves (p = 0.008) and the needing of ventilator support (p = 0.003) were associated with greater sequels at the discharge and at the posterior reviews in the following months. 17% required mechanical ventilation (MV). Values < 250 L/min in the Peak Flow-test are associated with an increased likelihood of requiring MV (p < 0.001).Conclusions: Older age, severe deficits at onset, injured cranial nerves, requiring MV, and axonal lesion patterns in the NCS were demonstrated as poor prognostic factors. Peak Flow-test is a useful predictive factor of respiratory failure by its easy management. © 2013 González-Suárez et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

González-Suárez, I., Sanz-Gallego, I., Rodríguez de Rivera, F. J., & Arpa, J. (2013). Guillain-Barré Syndrome: Natural history and prognostic factors: A retrospective review of 106 cases. BMC Neurology, 13. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2377-13-95

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free