Test-retest reliability of a simplified questionnaire for screening adolescents with risk behaviors for eating disorders in epidemiologic studies

31Citations
Citations of this article
21Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Introduction: The number of people presenting abnormal eating behaviors based on the habit of going on strict diets and taking measures to compensate food consumption (use of laxatives, diuretics, and self-induced vomiting) is growing. There is a clear need for simple investigative tools in population-based studies. Objective: Evaluate the reliability of a simplified questionnaire to investigate risk behaviors for eating disorders (ED) among adolescents. Methods: The questionnaire had two questions: the second question was subdivided into four other ones, about the frequency of binge eating episodes, the use of laxatives and diuretics, self-induced vomiting, and strict dieting. It was applied in two moments (test-retest), with an interval of 15 days between the two assessments, in 195 students (70% girls) aged from 12 to 19.9 years, from a Niterói/RJ public school. The reliability of the questions was assessed through the weighted Kappa coefficient and their 95% respective confidence intervals (CI) and frequency adjusted kappa. Results: Frequency-adjusted kappa values for less frequent behaviors were: 0.93 for the use of laxatives, 0.97 for the use of diuretics and 0.92 for self-induced vomiting. For the more frequent risk behaviors for ED such as binge eating episodes and restrictive dieting, weighted Kappa coefficients were 0.50 and 0.61, respectively. Conclusions: The reliability of the questionnaire was good, with better results for investigating less frequent behaviors.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Ferreira, J. E. D. S., & Da Veiga, G. V. (2008). Test-retest reliability of a simplified questionnaire for screening adolescents with risk behaviors for eating disorders in epidemiologic studies. Revista Brasileira de Epidemiologia, 11(3), 393–401. https://doi.org/10.1590/s1415-790x2008000300006

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free