Pre-operative trans-thoracic doppler ultrasonography evaluation and intra- operative manual evaluation of the left internal thoracic artery in patients with type 2 diabetes with coronary artery disease

1Citations
Citations of this article
13Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Patients with coronary artery disease, with (n = 25) and without (n = 59) type 2 diabetes, who were scheduled to undergo coronary artery bypass grafting were enrolled in this prospective study. The left internal thoracic artery (LITA) was assessed for graft suitability before surgery by trans-thoracic Doppler ultra- sonography and during surgery by manual measurement. Significant differences were seen between pre- operative and intra-operative LITA blood flow rates and LITA diameters, and the values of each at the two time points showed significant correlation, suggesting that pre-operative measurements largely related to intra-operative conditions. The pre-operative and intra-operative LITA blood flow rates and LITA diameters were not significantly different between patients with and without type 2 diabetes. Pre-operative LITA blood flow was monophasic in three patients without diabetes and the LITA grafts of these patients were deemed unsuitable for implantation during surgery. It is concluded that type 2 diabetes does not seem to have a negative effect on the suitability of LITA grafts. In addition, trans-thoracic Doppler ultrasonography is an easy, cost-effective, reproducible and non-invasive examination method, which may help in the evaluation of LIMA function and contribute to graft selection. © 2011 Field House Publishing LLP.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Cihan, H. B., Erbas, F., Erdil, N., Sigirci, A., Battaloglu, B., & Yologlu, S. (2011). Pre-operative trans-thoracic doppler ultrasonography evaluation and intra- operative manual evaluation of the left internal thoracic artery in patients with type 2 diabetes with coronary artery disease. Journal of International Medical Research, 39(1), 277–283. https://doi.org/10.1177/147323001103900130

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free