Critical Evaluation of Metaheuristic Algorithms for Weight Minimization of Truss Structures

19Citations
Citations of this article
40Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

This study critically compares variants of Genetic Algorithms (GAs), Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO), Artificial Bee Colony (ABC), Differential Evolution (DE), and Simulated Annealing (SA) used in truss sizing optimization problems including displacement and stress constraints. The comparison is based on several benchmark problems of varying complexity measured by the number of design variables and the degree of static indeterminacy. Most of these problems have been studied by numerous researchers using a large variety of methods; this allows for absolute rather than relative comparison. Rigorous statistical analysis based on large sample size, as well as monitoring of the success rate throughout the optimization process, reveal and explain the convergence behavior observed for each method. The results indicate that, for the problem at hand, Differential Evolution is the best algorithm in terms of robustness, performance, and scalability.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Charalampakis, A. E., & Tsiatas, G. C. (2019). Critical Evaluation of Metaheuristic Algorithms for Weight Minimization of Truss Structures. Frontiers in Built Environment, 5. https://doi.org/10.3389/fbuil.2019.00113

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free