Evaluating the impact of covariate lookback times on performance of patient-level prediction models

4Citations
Citations of this article
13Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Background: The goal of our study is to examine the impact of the lookback length when engineering features to use in developing predictive models using observational healthcare data. Using a longer lookback for feature engineering gives more insight about patients but increases the issue of left-censoring. Methods: We used five US observational databases to develop patient-level prediction models. A target cohort of subjects with hypertensive drug exposures and outcome cohorts of subjects with acute (stroke and gastrointestinal bleeding) and chronic outcomes (diabetes and chronic kidney disease) were developed. Candidate predictors that exist on or prior to the target index date were derived within the following lookback periods: 14, 30, 90, 180, 365, 730, and all days prior to index were evaluated. We predicted the risk of outcomes occurring 1 day until 365 days after index. Ten lasso logistic models for each lookback period were generated to create a distribution of area under the curve (AUC) metrics to evaluate the discriminative performance of the models. Calibration intercept and slope were also calculated. Impact on external validation performance was investigated across five databases. Results: The maximum differences in AUCs for the models developed using different lookback periods within a database was < 0.04 for diabetes (in MDCR AUC of 0.593 with 14-day lookback vs. AUC of 0.631 with all-time lookback) and 0.012 for renal impairment (in MDCR AUC of 0.675 with 30-day lookback vs. AUC of 0.687 with 365-day lookback). For the acute outcomes, the max difference in AUC across lookbacks within a database was 0.015 (in MDCD AUC of 0.767 with 14-day lookback vs. AUC 0.782 with 365-day lookback) for stroke and < 0.03 for gastrointestinal bleeding (in CCAE AUC of 0.631 with 14-day lookback vs. AUC of 0.660 with 730-day lookback). Conclusions: In general the choice of covariate lookback had only a small impact on discrimination and calibration, with a short lookback (< 180 days) occasionally decreasing discrimination. Based on the results, if training a logistic regression model for prediction then using covariates with a 365 day lookback appear to be a good tradeoff between performance and interpretation.

References Powered by Scopus

Derivation and validation of QRISK, a new cardiovascular disease risk score for the United Kingdom: Prospective open cohort study

809Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Validation of a common data model for active safety surveillance research

395Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

The performance of different lookback periods and sources of information for Charlson comorbidity adjustment in medicare claims

151Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

OMOP CDM Can Facilitate Data-Driven Studies for Cancer Prediction: A Systematic Review

34Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Machine Learning and Real-World Data to Predict Lung Cancer Risk in Routine Care

28Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Development and validation of a patient-level model to predict dementia across a network of observational databases

0Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Hardin, J., & Reps, J. M. (2021). Evaluating the impact of covariate lookback times on performance of patient-level prediction models. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 21(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-021-01370-2

Readers over time

‘21‘22‘23‘24‘2501234

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 2

67%

Researcher 1

33%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Medicine and Dentistry 1

33%

Business, Management and Accounting 1

33%

Computer Science 1

33%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0