Cores and Peripheries: Interaction Patterns in Asia

5Citations
Citations of this article
2Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

This analysis seeks to determine the nature of interaction patterns among various Asian countries, and between them and three nonregional actors (the United Kingdom, the United States, and the USSR). The results indicate that military and cultural exchange patterns provide the strongest support for the feudal interaction model, while diplomatic exchange patterns tend to contradict it. A trend of defeudalization seemed to have set in for diplomatic interactions during the 1970s. On the other hand, economic and communications interactions have apparently moved in the opposite direction. Thus, data for different dimensions of international relations reveal different degrees and trends of feudal interaction. Moreover, they show important differences in the positions of various putative core states and in the scope of their spheres of influence. The existence of status incongruity and fluctuating domains for these countries encourages further study to explore the possibility of conflict among them. © 1982, SAGE PUBLICATIONS. All rights reserved.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Chan, S. (1982). Cores and Peripheries: Interaction Patterns in Asia. Comparative Political Studies, 15(3), 314–340. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414082015003003

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free