Survivorship of the KUDO total elbow prosthesis - Comparative study of cemented and uncemented ulnar components: 89 Cases followed for an average of 6 years

33Citations
Citations of this article
26Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Background: The Kudo total elbow prosthesis (TEP) is a well-established implant with good mid-term results. The ulnar component can be placed with or without cement, and the humeral component is normally placed without cement. Methods: 89 Kudo type-5 total elbow prostheses were evaluated after a mean follow-up of 6 (1.7-11) years. The indication for joint replacement was rheumatoid arthritis in all cases. 49 prostheses were placed without cement. In 40 cases, the ulnar component was cemented and the humeral component was uncemented. Results: In the uncemented group, 7 revisions had taken place. 3 of these ulnar components were shortstemmed and 4 were long-stemmed. No revisions had been performed in the hybrid group. In the uncemented group another 7 patients showed progressive radiolucencies, while 3 patients in the hybrid group showed progressive radiolucencies. Interpretation: In this group of RA patients, the survivorship of the cemented ulnar component was better than that of the uncemented ulnar component. Copyright© Taylor & Francis 2007. all rights reserved.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Van Der Heide, H. J. L., De Vos, M. J., Brinkman, J. M., Eygendaal, D., Hoogen, F. H. J. V. D., & Malefijt, M. C. D. W. (2007). Survivorship of the KUDO total elbow prosthesis - Comparative study of cemented and uncemented ulnar components: 89 Cases followed for an average of 6 years. Acta Orthopaedica, 78(2), 258–262. https://doi.org/10.1080/17453670710013771

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free