Advocates, adversaries, and adjuncts: The ethics of international science journalism from a US perspective

1Citations
Citations of this article
24Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

The traditional image of journalists as adversaries of the establishment is sometimes blurred by the complex relationship between reporters and scientists, particularly in developing countries where advancing science and technology is seen as essential to economic growth, and journalists, intentionally or not, may become advocates for this national goal. The changing nature of media technology, coupled with intense market pressures, is further complicating the role of science journalists as many have become affiliated with research organizations: institutional adjuncts providing information directly to the public. While it is difficult to develop a single set of ethical standards that can be applied globally - or that can address the new realities of modern science communication-existing models suggest that peer pressure can be an effective method of policing journalistic misconduct, even on an international scale. © Inter-Research 2009.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Cornell, J. (2009). Advocates, adversaries, and adjuncts: The ethics of international science journalism from a US perspective. Ethics in Science and Environmental Politics, 9(1), 17–24. https://doi.org/10.3354/esep00098

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free