Communicating and diagnosing non-specific low back pain: A qualitative study of the healthcare practitioners' perspectives using a social diagnosis framework

7Citations
Citations of this article
67Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Background: There is general agreement that nonspecific low back pain is best understood within a biopsychosocial understanding of health. However, clinicians and patients seemingly adhere to a biomedical model, which may introduce misperceptions of pain and does not inform treatment or prognosis. Objective: To explore, from the perspective of healthcare practitioners, how persistent nonspecific low back pain may be communicated in a way that moves beyond a biomedical diagnosis. Design: An explorative qualitative investigation using a constructivist diagnostic framework. Methods: Focus group and individual interviews of 10 purposefully selected chiropractors, physiotherapists and general practitioners were codified and thematically analysed. Results: Four themes emerged: "Clinicians' nuanced understanding of back pain"; "The challenges of shared decision-making"; "Cultural barriers to moving beyond biomedicine"; and "More than a label - individual explanations for pain". Pain and disability were perceived as products of multiple bio-psychosocial factors. Clinicians identified the impact of multiple social actors, an unhealthy work culture, and the organization of the medical system on the notion of pain and suffering. Conclusion: Clinicians perceived a need to communicate the complexity of non-specific low back pain in order to help patients make sense of their condition, rather than applying diagnostic labelling. There are multiple barriers to integrating a constructivistic diagnostic framework into clinical practice that need to be overcome.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Arnborg Lund, R., Kongsted, A., Bäcker Hansen, E., & Myburgh, C. (2020). Communicating and diagnosing non-specific low back pain: A qualitative study of the healthcare practitioners’ perspectives using a social diagnosis framework. Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine, 52(3). https://doi.org/10.2340/16501977-2656

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free