Improving vitamin D status in bariatric surgery subjects with monthly high-dose ergocalciferol: A randomized clinical trial

10Citations
Citations of this article
41Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Background: Vitamin D insufficiency is common before and after bariatric surgery. Optimal supplementation to treat vitamin D insufficiency is not clearly defined. Objective: Determine if serum 25 (OH) D levels improve by the consumption of an additional monthly ergocalciferol supplement by subjects after bariatric surgery. Study design: Thirty-two subjects were randomly divided to receive an additional 100,000 IUs of ergocalciferol monthly after bariatric surgery (n=10) or standard level vitamin D supplement after bariatric surgery (n=22). Serum 25 (OH) D, calcium, and hemoglobin A1c levels were measured preoperatively and one year after bariatric surgery. Results: Mean changes in BMI at 1-year post-operation was -18.12±6.46 kg/m2in the control group versus -18.84±4.7 kg/m2; p=0.638 in the vitamin D group. One year after bariatric surgery, the mean changes from baseline in vitamin D levels were 2.69±9.4 and 12.4±17.0 ng/mL in control and intervention groups, respectively. The treated group showed a marginally higher mean increase in Vitamin D than the control group, p=0.059. Other mean changes at 1-year post-surgery that were not significantly different include calcium -0.264±0.45 and -0.21±0.509 mg/dl in control and intervention groups, respectively and HbA1c -1.0±1.21 and -0.95±0.071% in control and intervention groups, respectively. Conclusion: This study showed 100,000 IUs ergocalciferol once a month is a safe and effective treatment for vitamin D insufficiency in most patients having bariatric surgery.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Galyean, S., Syn, D., Subih, H. S., & Boylan, M. (2022). Improving vitamin D status in bariatric surgery subjects with monthly high-dose ergocalciferol: A randomized clinical trial. International Journal for Vitamin and Nutrition Research, 92(2), 109–117. https://doi.org/10.1024/0300-9831/a000728

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free