History and impact of nutritional epidemiology

9Citations
Citations of this article
52Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

The real and important role of epidemiology was discussed, noting heretofore unknown associations that led to improved understanding of the cause and prevention of individual nutritional deficiencies. However, epidemiology has been less successful in linking individual nutrients to the cause of chronic diseases, such as cancer and cardiovascular disease. Dietary changes, such as decreasing caloric intake to prevent cancer and the Mediterranean diet to prevent diabetes, were confirmed as successful approaches to modifying the incidence of chronic diseases. The role of the epidemiologist was confirmed as a collaborator, not an isolated expert of last resort. The challenge for the future is to decide which epidemiologic methods and study designs are most useful in studying chronic disease, then to determine which associations and the hypotheses derived from them are especially strong and worthy of pursuit, and finally to design randomized studies that are feasible, affordable, and likely to result in confirmation or refutation of these hypotheses.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Alpers, D. H., Bier, D. M., Carpenter, K. J., McCormick, D. B., Miller, A. B., & Jacques, P. F. (2014). History and impact of nutritional epidemiology. In Advances in Nutrition (Vol. 5, pp. 534–536). American Society for Nutrition. https://doi.org/10.3945/an.114.006353

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free