Abstract
Objective: Examine effectiveness of a state's Youth Expanded Food and Nutrition Education Program (EFNEP) and assess the validity of the federal impact indicator method for reporting program outcomes. Design: A randomized, controlled field trial of 229 groups with 5,111 youth, 9-12 years old, in community settings. Intervention: 6- to 8- hour, 7-lesson education experience with food preparation and tasting, an education experience typical of EFNEP in California. Outcome Measures: US Department of Agriculture (USDA) impact indicators: nutrition knowledge, eating a variety of foods, food selection, and food preparation and safety practices. Analysis: Analysis of covariance model controlling for pretest, gender, age, and ethnicity, with group nested in condition. Results: Organizing responses by impact indicators, treatment participants made significant gains on the posttest compared to controls for 3 of 4 indicators (P < .008 to P < .0001). Gains were made by 34 to 68% of youth participants for 4 indicators. The impact indicator method for federal reporting compared favorably with results from a randomized controlled trial with groups nested in conditions. Conclusion and Implications: This is the first report in the literature of (1) a large evaluation study of Youth EFNEP and (2) an estimate of the validity of the USDA impact indicator method for reporting program outcomes. © 2006 SOCIETY FOR NUTRITION EDUCATION.
Author supplied keywords
Cite
CITATION STYLE
Townsend, M. S., Johns, M., Shilts, M. K., & Farfan-Ramirez, L. (2006). Evaluation of a USDA Nutrition Education Program for Low-income Youth. Journal of Nutrition Education and Behavior, 38(1), 30–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jneb.2005.11.014
Register to see more suggestions
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.