The results of spinal cord stimulation in critical limb ischaemia: A review

39Citations
Citations of this article
26Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Objectives: to determine which patients with unreconstructible critical limb ischaemia (CLI) might benefit from spinal cord stimulation (SCS). Methods: literature review. Results: limb salvage in patients with an intermediate transcutaneous oxygen pressure (TcpO2) was not significantly higher with SCS (76%) than with conservative therapy (p = 0.08). However, a limb salvage of 88% was achieved with SCS if the difference between the supine and sitting TcpO2 baseline values (ΔTcpO2) was ≥ 15 mmHg. A rise in TcpO2 after trial stimulation of at least 15% resulted in a limb salvage of 77% at 18 months (p<0.01). Conclusion: randomised studies show no benefit of SCS over conservative therapy in patients with non-reconstructible CLI. However, data from experimental and non-randomised studies suggest this may be due to sub-optimal patient selection for SCS. Further trials are needed to identify subgroups who may benefit from SCS.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Spincemaille, G. H. J. J., De Vet, H. C. W., Ubbink, D., & Jacobs, M. J. H. M. (2001). The results of spinal cord stimulation in critical limb ischaemia: A review. European Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery. W.B. Saunders Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1053/ejvs.2000.1291

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free