The BSCM score: a guideline for surgical decision-making for brainstem cavernous malformations

10Citations
Citations of this article
19Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Microsurgical resection of brainstem cavernous malformations (BSCMs) can be performed today with acceptable morbidity and mortality. However, in this highly eloquent location, the indication for surgery remains challenging. We aimed to elaborate a score system that may help clinicians with their choice of treatment in patients with BSCMs in this study. A single-center series of 88 consecutive BSCMs patients with 272 follow-up visits were included in this study. Univariable and multivariable generalized estimating equations (GEE) were constructed to identify the association of variables with treatment decisions. A score scale assigned points for variables that significantly contributed to surgical decision-making. Surgical treatment was recommended in 37 instances, while conservative treatment was proposed in 235 instances. The mean follow-up duration was 50.4 months, and the mean age at decision-making was 45.9 years. The mean BSCMs size was 14.3 ml. In the multivariable GEE model, patient age, lesion size, hemorrhagic event(s), mRS, and axial location were identified as significant factors for determining treatment options. With this proposed score scale (grades 0–XII), non-surgery was the first option at grades 0–III. The crossover point between surgery and non-surgery recommendations lay between grades V and VI while surgical treatment was found in favor at grades VII–X. In conclusion, the proposed BSCM operating score is a clinician-friendly tool, which may help neurosurgeons decide on the treatment for patients with BSCMs.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Yang, Y., Velz, J., Neidert, M. C., Lang, W., Regli, L., & Bozinov, O. (2022). The BSCM score: a guideline for surgical decision-making for brainstem cavernous malformations. Neurosurgical Review, 45(2), 1579–1587. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10143-021-01679-y

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free