What makes transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation work? Making sense of the mixed results in the clinical literature

148Citations
Citations of this article
328Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) is a nonpharmacological treatment for control of pain. It has come under much scrutiny lately with the Center for Medicare Services rendering "A recent decision stating that TENS is not reasonable and necessary for the treatment of CLBP [chronic low back pain]". When reading and analyzing the existing literature for which systematic reviews show that TENS is inconclusive or ineffective, it is clear that a number of variables related to TENS application have not been considered. Although many of the trials were designed with the highest of standards, recent evidence suggests that factors related to TENS application need to be considered in an assessment of efficacy. These factors include dosing of TENS, negative interactions with long-term opioid use, the population and outcome assessed, timing of outcome measurement, and comparison groups. The purpose of this perspective is to highlight and interpret recent evidence to help improve the design of clinical trials and the efficacy of TENS in the clinical setting. © 2013 American Physical Therapy Association.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Sluka, K. A., Bjordal, J. M., Marchand, S., & Rakel, B. A. (2013). What makes transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation work? Making sense of the mixed results in the clinical literature. Physical Therapy, 93(10), 1397–1402. https://doi.org/10.2522/ptj.20120281

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free