Development and Implementation of a Standard Format for Clinical Laboratory Test Results

6Citations
Citations of this article
30Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Objectives: Surprisingly, laboratory results, the principal output of clinical laboratories, are not standardized. Thus, laboratories frequently report results with identical meaning in different formats. For example, laboratories report a positive pregnancy test as "+,""P,"or "Positive."To assess the feasibility of a widespread implementation of a result standard, we (1) developed a standard result format for common laboratory tests and (2) implemented a feedback system for clinical laboratories to view their unstandardized results. Methods: In the largest integrated health care system in America, 130 facilities had the opportunity to collaboratively develop the standard. For 15 weeks, clinical laboratories received a weekly report of their unstandardized results. At the study's conclusion, laboratories were compared with themselves and their peers by metrics that reflected their unstandardized results. Results: We rereviewed 156 million test results and observed a 51% decline in the rate of unstandardized results. The number of facilities with fewer than 23 unstandardized results per 100,000 (Six Sigma σ > 5) increased by 58% (52 to 82 facilities; β = 1.79; P

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Hauser, R. G., Quine, D. B., Iscoe, M., & Arvisais-Anhalt, S. (2022). Development and Implementation of a Standard Format for Clinical Laboratory Test Results. American Journal of Clinical Pathology, 158(3), 409–415. https://doi.org/10.1093/ajcp/aqac067

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free