DO COMPREHENSIVE AND SELECTIVE CORRECTIVE FEEDBACK REALLY WORK FOR L2 WRITING ACCURACY? AN OVERVIEW FROM INDONESIAN CONTEXT

  • Herlinawati
  • Saukah A
  • Mukminatien N
  • et al.
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
10Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Purpose of the study: Investigating the effect of corrective feedback on Indonesian students' writing accuracy was the aim of this present study. Methodology: The methods used were a true experiment with a pretest-treatment-posttest-delayed posttest design was employed to address the research questions and a two-way ANOVA to examine. Main Findings: The data collected was the grammatical accuracy scores from the three groups (comprehensive corrective feedback/CCF, selective corrective feedback/SCF, and non-grammatical feedback/NGF). Applications of this study: Indonesian EFL students’. Novelty/Originality of this study: EFL writing teacher is suggested to accommodate the integrated teaching of grammatical features in a communicative context.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Herlinawati, Saukah, A., Mukminatien, N., Masruroh Isnawati, U., & Bastian, A. (2020). DO COMPREHENSIVE AND SELECTIVE CORRECTIVE FEEDBACK REALLY WORK FOR L2 WRITING ACCURACY? AN OVERVIEW FROM INDONESIAN CONTEXT. Humanities & Social Sciences Reviews, 8(1), 69–77. https://doi.org/10.18510/hssr.2020.8110

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free