Induction of Labor as Compared with Serial Antenatal Monitoring in Post-Term Pregnancy

  • Hannah M
  • Hannah W
  • et al.
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
54Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Abstract Background The rates of perinatal mortality and neonatal morbidity are higher for post-term pregnancies than for term pregnancies. It is not known, however, whether the induction of labor results in better outcomes than does serial fetal monitoring while awaiting spontaneous labor. Methods We studied 3407 women with uncomplicated pregnancies of 41 or more weeks' duration. The women were randomly assigned to undergo induction of labor or to have serial antenatal monitoring and spontaneous labor unless there was evidence of fetal or maternal compromise, in which case labor was induced or cesarean section was performed. In the induction group, labor was induced by the intracervical application of prostaglandin E2. Serial antenatal monitoring consisted of counts of fetal kicks, nonstress tests, and assessments of amniotic-fluid volume. The outcomes we measured were the rates of perinatal mortality, neonatal morbidity, and delivery by cesarean section. Results Among the 1701 women in the induction gro...

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Hannah, M. E., Hannah, W. J., Hellmann, J., Hewson, S., Milner, R., & Willan, A. (1992). Induction of Labor as Compared with Serial Antenatal Monitoring in Post-Term Pregnancy. New England Journal of Medicine, 326(24), 1587–1592. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejm199206113262402

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free