A comparative study of once-daily versus twice-daily filgrastim administration for the mobilization and collection of CD34+ peripheral blood progenitor cells in normal donors

45Citations
Citations of this article
19Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Eighty-one first-time normal donors underwent leukapheresis for peripheral blood progenitor cell (PBPC) collection after mobilization with filgrastim administered either twice-daily (6 μg/kg every 12 h: n = 40) or once-daily (12 μg/kg: n = 41) subcutaneously for 3 d. The groups were similar for age, donor blood volume and target CD34+ cell dose to be collected (≤ 4 x 106 CD34+ cells/kg recipient). There was no statistically significant difference in the apheresis yield of CD34+ PBPCs (x 106) per kg recipient weight (5·6 ± 3·3 vs. 5·6 ± 4·3: P = 0·94) and per litre of blood processed (30± 17·2 vs. 30·4 ± 19·5: P = 0·92).

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Anderlini, P., Donato, M., Lauppe, M. J., Huh, Y. O., Martin, T. G., Chan, K. W., … Körbling, M. (2000). A comparative study of once-daily versus twice-daily filgrastim administration for the mobilization and collection of CD34+ peripheral blood progenitor cells in normal donors. British Journal of Haematology, 109(4), 770–772. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2141.2000.02083.x

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free