Traditional knowledge systems, international law and national challenges: Marginalization or emancipation?

27Citations
Citations of this article
63Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Traditional knowledge systems of indigenous and local communities have been of immense value over millennia. They have filled the breadbasket that has fed the world, provided medicines that have healed the world, and provided for the sustainable management of resources, including biodiversity. In short, these knowledge systems have fed, clothed, and healed the world. They may yet hold the key to dealing with the risks posed by climate change. Yet today they are in danger of being marginalized. This article identifies the threats, the inadequacy of the international legal architecture, and the faltering national attempts to reassert their role. It identifies the varying interests and elements and assesses their influence in the marginalization and resuscitation of traditional knowledge systems; and finally argues for the emancipation of these systems and their restoration to the plurality of knowledge systems to provide sustainable solutions to natcopyural resource management. © The Author, 2013. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of EJIL Ltd. All rights reserved.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Nijar, G. S. (2013). Traditional knowledge systems, international law and national challenges: Marginalization or emancipation? European Journal of International Law, 24(4), 1205–1221. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejil/cht077

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free