Potential Ecological Effects of the Proposed GRAND Canal Diversion Project on Hudson and James Bays

  • Milko R
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
11Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

The GRAND Canal scheme, which by the construction of a dikeacross James Bay would divert 61%of Hudson Bay’s freshwater budget south, has ecological implications for the North. The formation of ice in Hudson Bay could increase as its pycnocline develops earlier in the spring and deepens in the summer and ice breakup is delayed because of the removal of the warm James Bay outflow in the spring. A reduction in primary productivity could result because of changes in the pycnocline’s development, the removal of nutrients normally associated with spring’s melting ice and a decrease in stable stratification periods as the dike removes the dampening action of James Bay on tidal and wind-generated disturbances. Changes in nuuient content and freshwater circulation out of Hudson Bay could potentially affect productivity downstream on the Labrador Shelf, and changes in productivity and icepack within Hudson Bay would detrimentally affect fishes and marine mammals. Changes to coastal staging areas in both bays would most likely destroy a major portion of the North American migratory bird population.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Milko, R. (1986). Potential Ecological Effects of the Proposed GRAND Canal Diversion Project on Hudson and James Bays. ARCTIC, 39(4). https://doi.org/10.14430/arctic2094

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free