Do Patients Underestimate Their Symptoms in Hindsight? An Ambulatory Assessment Study on the Frequency of Dissociation in Posttraumatic Stress Disorder

  • Beutler S
  • Daniels J
  • Laddis A
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
5Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Assessing symptom frequencies is a core feature of psychological diagnostics and any evaluation of the effectiveness of a therapeutic approach is based on these. However, heuristic strategies are employed when estimating the frequency of past events, which can lead to recall biases. While the few studies published to date indicate that patients suffering from posttraumatic stress disorder tend to underreport dissociative symptoms, there is also some evidence for the tendency to overreport dissociative symptoms. To gain insights into absolute frequencies of dissociative symptoms and retrospective reporting styles we used ambulatory assessment in 42 participants with PTSD symptoms. Participants logged their symptoms via smartphone over 2 weeks and then estimated them again retrospectively for this entire period. In comparison to the daily logs, more participants tended to retrospectively underestimate experienced symptoms in their frequency for almost all items. The results reported in this sample thus argue for an underreporting style instead of overreporting of dissociative symptoms.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Beutler, S., Daniels, J., & Laddis, A. (2020). Do Patients Underestimate Their Symptoms in Hindsight? An Ambulatory Assessment Study on the Frequency of Dissociation in Posttraumatic Stress Disorder. Frontiers in the Psychotherapy of Trauma and Dissociation, 4(1), 105–120. https://doi.org/10.46716/ftpd.2020.0037

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free