Why be yourself? Kantian respect and frankfurtian identification

11Citations
Citations of this article
13Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Your institution provides access to this article.

Abstract

Harry Frankfurt has claimed that some of our desires are 'internal', i.e., our own in a special sense. I defend the idea that a desire's being internal matters in a normative, reasons-involving sense, and offer an explanation for this fact. The explanation is Kantian in spirit. We have reason to respect the desires of persons in so far as respecting them is a way to respect the persons who have them (in some cases, ourselves). But if desires matter normatively in so far as they belong to persons, then it matters whether they really do belong to the persons who have them. Thus Kantian considerations explain why identification (or internality) is a normatively relevant category. This account is superior to others, and does not lead to reasons bootstrapping or a self-centred conception of deliberation. © 2011 The Author The Philosophical Quarterly © 2011 The Editors of The Philosophical Quarterly.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Henning, T. (2011). Why be yourself? Kantian respect and frankfurtian identification. Philosophical Quarterly, 61(245), 725–745. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9213.2011.707.x

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free