Abstract
Background: Hand-sewn intestinal resection and anastomosis are commonly performed in veterinary medicine. The outcome of the hand-sewn side-to-side anastomosis (SSA) technique has never been described and compared to other techniques in dogs and cats. Aim: The study aims to describe the side-to-side hand-sewn anastomosis technique in small animals and to compare it with the end-to-end technique. Methods: A retrospective evaluation of the clinical records of dogs and cats that underwent enterectomy between 2000 and 2020 and were treated with side-to-side or end-to-end anastomosis (EEA) was performed. Results: Of the 52 dogs and 16 cats included in the study, 19 dogs and 6 cats received an SSA, and the remaining received an EEA. No intraoperative complication was reported. However, short-term complication rates were comparable, and mortality rates in the EEA group were higher. At the same time, stenosis was a frequent complication of SSA and was never reported following EEA. Conclusion: End-to-end technique remains the gold standard for hand-sewn intestinal anastomosis in small animals. However, SSA can be considered for selected cases with acceptable morbidity and mortality rates.
Author supplied keywords
Cite
CITATION STYLE
Ciammaichella, L., Foglia, A., Del Magno, S., Cola, V., Zanardi, S., Tinto, D., … Pisoni, L. (2023). Retrospective evaluation of a hand-sewn side-to-side intestinal anastomosis technique in dogs and cats. Open Veterinary Journal, 13(3), 278–287. https://doi.org/10.5455/OVJ.2023.v13.i3.4
Register to see more suggestions
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.