Construction and validation of a preterm birth risk assessment model using fuzzy analytic hierarchy process

3Citations
Citations of this article
29Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Preterm births account for almost 1 million deaths globally. The objective of this study is to develop and evaluate a model that assists clinicians in assessing the risk of preterm birth, using fuzzy multicriteria analysis. The model allows experts to incorporate their intuition and judgment into the decision-making process and takes into consideration six (6) risk dimensions reflecting the socio-economic, behavioral and medical profile of pregnant women, thus adopting a holistic approach to risk assessment. Each risk dimension is further analyzed and measured in terms of risk factors associated with it. Data were collected from a selected group of 35 experts, each one with more than 20 years of obstetric experience. The model criteria were selected after a thorough literature analysis, so as to ensure a holistic approach to risk assessment. The criteria were reviewed by the experts and the model structure was finalized. The fuzzy analytic hierarchy method was applied to calculate the relative importance of each criterion and subsequent use of the model in assessing and ranking pregnant women by their preterm risk. The proposed model utilizes fuzzy logic and multicriteria analysis. It addresses the multifactorial nature of decision making when assessing the preterm birth risk. It also incorporates the obstetricians’ intuitive judgment during risk assessment, and it can be used to classify cases based on their risk level. In addition, it can be applied to evaluate the risk of individual cases in a personalized manner. The proposed model is compared and validated for its predictive value against judgments made by experts.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Barbounaki, S., & Sarantaki, A. (2022). Construction and validation of a preterm birth risk assessment model using fuzzy analytic hierarchy process. Bosnian Journal of Basic Medical Sciences, 22(2), 291–299. https://doi.org/10.17305/bjbms.2021.6431

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free